The following was filmed in Newcastle at the Lawful Rebellion Roadshow launch event at Tyneside Irish Centre. The event was organised by The British Constitution Group and hosted by ourselves, North East Truth

These videos are being taken down and are being uploaded to other peoples youtube channels so please report broken links here so we can update. Thanks

The low quality second video below includes the 6 minute section which is missing between the first and second high definition videos. All other videos apart from this second one are new high definition youtube videos. The original article follows after.

Part 1 (HD)

Part 2 (HD)

Part 3 (HD)

Part 4 (HD)

Part 5 (HD)

by Robert Green
The UK Column

In the October 2009 print edition of the UK Column, we reported in our article “BBC Hides Truth of Girl’s Sexual Abuse Ordeal” the shocking ordeal of Downs Syndrome girl, Hollie Greig, who was horribly abused by an Aberdeen paedophile ring, over a period of ten years. After investigating and planning a documentary, the BBC abruptly dropped the case, despite admitting that Hollie was a reliable and accurate witness. It is important to stress that both the police and qualified medical experts have described Hollie as a competent and entirely honest witness.

From the age of just six, Hollie was repeatedly sexually abused by her father, Denis Charles Mackie. Later, Mackie began sharing his daughter with a gang of paedophile “swingers” that has been operating in Aberdeen for many years. The identities of a further seven child victims are already known. There is no question that the gang are well-connected, efficiently organised and totally ruthless. Our frightening story is that they are protected by individuals of “high standing” within the Scottish establishment.

In 2000, after 14 years of terrified silence, Hollie eventually told her mother, Anne, about the abuses. Formal statements were made to Grampian Police, providing all the horrifying details and the names of the abusers. They included a senior Scottish Sheriff, a policeman, social workers, a nurse, a solicitor, an accountant, a fire officer, married couples and others. Some of the rapes were carried out at the homes of these individuals, including that of the Sheriff’s sister. Other children were sometimes involved, including children of the paedophiles themselves.

The latest chapters in this astonishing and horrifying story about Hollie, and the seven other abused children, have taken place over the past few weeks. The key issues are a continued refusal by Grampian police to fully investigate the overwhelming evidence for the paedophile rapes, and a wall of silence by the Scottish establishment.

Whilst there has been some general Scottish media coverage, notably in The Firm and the Aberdeen Press and Journal, the media has been largely silent on what must be one of Scotlands worst top level paedophile scandles. A key figure in the press silence is the Lord Advocate, in her former role as Procurator Fiscal in Aberdeen, when in 2000 she is alleged to have effectively buried the case. Was this to prevent her associate and most influential member of the paedophile ring, Sheriff X, from being investigated, along with the other named members of the fifteen-strong rape gang?

Elish Angiolini, the Scottish Lord Advocate, is in charge of all criminal prosecutions. She is alleged to have reacted immediately to public calls for a full police investigation, by pressurising against publication. Subsequently, and under considerable duress, The Firm published an apology. Shortly afterwards the Press and Journal ran a story accurately describing the case, mentioning a sheriff and police officer without identifying them. Angiolini was not discussed in the article.

Mrs Angiolini`s role in the case recently aroused further suspicion, when it was claimed that she had used a private law firm, Levy and McRae, to issue warnings against all major Scottish editors, threatening them with legal action if any mention was made of her involvement in the case. Suspicious and angry, many individuals directly working to obtain justice for Hollie, as well as a growing number of the general public, now consider that key establishment figures, many with direct responsibility for criminal investigations and justice, have made a concerted and continuous effort to conceal the facts from the people of Scotland. Despite the pressure, investigators and campaigners for Hollie continue to stress that they hold documentary proof of the Lord Advocate’s actions, as well as proof that she has repeatedly failed to tell the whole truth about her connections with the Hollie abuse case for whatever reason.
The senior partner in the Law Firm, Peter Watson, who is also head of litigation, is understood to have refused to comment as to whether the firm’s fees have been billed to Mrs Angiolini personally, or if they are being paid by the Scottish taxpayer.

Mrs Angiolini’s office decided in December 2009 that they would not pursue the case due to “insufficient evidence.” Corroborating evidence by private investigators and researchers indicates that other than Hollie, not one of the twenty-four named abusers and victims has even been questioned by Grampian Police.

This follows the pattern of 2000, when the crimes and perpetrators were first reported. At that time, the police later admitted that only one of the gang, Hollie`s father, had even been interviewed.

The UK Column is aware that investigators have just received from the Crown Office, after years of rebuttals, the Post Mortem report of Robert David Greig, brother of Hollie`s mother Anne. Robert died mysteriously in an alleged car fire in 1997. Despite extreme inconsistencies in witness statements and circumstances, no inquest took place and the cause of death was officially due to smoke inhalation.

The Post Mortem stated that Robert has suffered considerable damage to his skull, two broken ribs and a broken sternum. Informal professional medical opinion so far is of the view that Robert had been severely beaten, had alcohol forced down his throat and then thrown into the burning vehicle.

Although this was not known at the time, Hollie, in 2001, told her mother that just prior to his unexplained death, Robert had caught Hollie`s father sexually abusing her.

The campaign for justice for Hollie, and other vulnerable victims of paedophiles in England and South Wales, not only goes on, but has intensified as outraged members of the public have flooded Aberdeen with leaflets naming all current members of the gang, including the head of a special school. All Aberdeen Councillors and MPs have also been alerted, but with little effect. There appears to be a conspiracy of establishment silence where the abuse of Hollie is concerned. Many people in Aberdeen are asking just who possesses the courage and decency to stand up against these staggering and shocking crimes against most vulnerable members of society? Certainly not their elected national and local representatives.

UK Column volunteers continue to be shocked by the quantity and quality of evidence reaching them on the subject of paedophile and sexual abuse against young and vulnerable children in care and otherwise. The common theme is that victims and their supporters are unable to get any real support from Members of Parliament, Local Councillors, the Judiciary, Police and other ‘officials’. Many describe the creation of a wall of silence, often accompanied by targetted intimidation against the victims.

Recently a policeman personally told the UK Column that police had themselves experienced their own paedopile investigations suddenly being dropped by senior police officers. He added “If you want to really get to the paedophiles you should look at Westminster”. The implications of this statement are frightening – a paedophile ring amongst our political leaders – the political elite which has control of education and Social Services? The general public needs to open its eyes and confront this evil – and fast.

To view and join the discussion about this go to the UK Column forum and/or consider commenting on this article at the bottom.

And for further information also go to http://www.holliedemandsjustice.org/

It seems this is not the only case where Ms Angiolini has dragged her feet! (Telegraph article)

Veronica: Chapman, FMOTL

While, on the one hand, the sterling efforts of the UK Column (and many others) to expose the insidious corruptions of Common Purpose and paedophilia are to be thoroughly commended, the answer (the antidote) does not lie in mere exposure. For the simple reason that exposure is one thing, but ‘connection to day-to-day activities’ is another, and considerably more complex. (This all being a part of ‘their’ plan, of course. To create a complexity that is very difficult to see and to unravel). What is necessary, in practice, are ‘stonewalls’ against all of this. Practical stonewalls, or (to use the Internet idiom) ‘firewalls’. Well, that’s Lawful Rebellion.

Behind a firewall of Lawful Rebellion, it matters not one iota how corrupt the Monarch or Parliament are. Or whether the European Union even exists. Or whether Common Purpose exists. Or whether there are paedophiles around. And so on. For the simple reason that you have placed yourself, your family, and your friends, behind a firewall. All that is necessary is for each and every decent person to construct their own firewall, and every DECENT person is safe against anything but Nuclear Attack.

So what, exactly, IS Lawful Rebellion?

Well, it’s really very, very simple. Fundamentally a Mindset, based on plain Common Sense and reason.

The Mindset is: Not to be afraid on anyone. Because everyone is equal.

Which is very easy to say, of course. But what about the ‘doing’ part?

Well, that’s actually nothing like as hard as it sounds. All it takes is some basic understanding about the facts of life.

1. The understanding that the Common Law is the bedrock on which all civilisation is built, simply because it IS ‘civilisation’, i.e. ‘civilised and honourable behaviour’. And that’s all it is. Therefore, if you understand ‘civilised behaviour’, then you understand the Common Law. And, if you understand the Common Law (civilised behaviour), all you need to do is to lock your Mindset to it.
Once your Mindset is locked into civilised behaviour, everything you see around you becomes clearly defined. You are readily capable of detecting UNcivilised behaviour, and thus able to immediately raise up the firewall to block it.

2. The firewall consists, in practice, of nothing more than sensible, civilised, and reasonable questions. And these questions come simply from your understanding of what ‘civilised behaviour’ means. ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that is UNcivilised is capable of being questioned. For the simple reason that you know the questions will NOT be answerable by yardsticks derived from truth, decency and honesty, etc.

3. And this method has very distinct advantages. In-built into the system of corruption (we are all up against) MUST BE the fact that those who unwittingly perpetrate it, MUST NEVER realise they are doing so. The systems of corruption indoctrinate and ingrain so thoroughly that millions grow up not realising that they are being mind-molded into UNcivilised behaviour.

In short, when you ask such people reasonable, sensible, down-to-earth, very simple questions … THEY ARE IMMEDIATELY ALL AT SEA! They are simply stunned for an answer. Because it does not compute with their indoctrinated Mindset. Their basic reaction is simply to push the problem higher up the ‘chain of command’, and forget about it as soon as possible. This doesn’t help because those higher up the chain of command are similarly indoctrinated, and have no more idea than those ‘below’. The net result is that they steamroll on (not one of them knowing what else to do). They steamroll on, that is, UNTIL THEIR SHIP EVENTUALLY COLLIDES WITH THE HARBOUR WALL. The ‘harbour wall’ being your sensible, decent, unanswerable questions. At this point they are not only all at sea, but seriously torpedoed, bailing out like dervishes, and sinking fast.

And those are the levers you can use to built your firewall.

In short, therefore, Lawful Rebellion is simply chucking as many spanners as possible into the works. The ‘spanners’ simply being reasonable (fundamentally unanswerable) questions. If there were no corruption, if everyone and everything were acting decently and honestly in the first place, then those questions would not need to be asked. They would not be necessary, and would simply not apply.

Thus the whole situation is ‘self-correcting’.
As far as the questions are concerned: Make them up. Make them up as you go along. You’ll know (in your heart) what’s wrong, and you’ll also know (in your heart) what’s right. It’s all, in general, based on ‘authority’. And the fact that, in order for another to have any authority over you, YOU MUST EXTEND IT TO THEM. You must make the conscious (or sub-conscious) effort to bend to their will, and suppress your own will. SO JUST DON’T DO THAT. Don’t ‘bend’ to their will. Cling, like a crab, to your own free will.
So the first question to ask is: “What is your authority to place that demand on me? Where does your authority come from? Where and when did I, of my own free will, and not under duress or deception, promise any obligation to you? Where is it? Show me some documented proof”

Things that were raging ‘red hot’, suddenly go very cold when such questions are asked.That’s basically where it starts, and that’s Lawful Rebellion. And these questions apply to Courts, Police, Local Authorities … indeed EVERYONE.

The vast majority of Lawful Rebellion takes the form of correspondence, and does not ever become ‘physical’. However, there are instances where “the steamroller” gets to ‘physical’ e.g. Bailiffs on the doorstep. (Maybe even accompanied by Policymen).
So, perhaps, the ultimate thing to remember is this: Common Assault is a CRIME. Punishable by a prison sentence. And Common Assault is defined as ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE YOU TO FEEL UNLAWFULLY THREATENED. It does NOT have to be ‘physical’. It can be PURELY ‘mental’.

Thus, when approached in any kind of threatening manner, when they have no authority or jurisdiction to do so, YOU ARE BEING ASSAULTED. And whoever is approaching you is COMMITTING A CRIME.

SUCH AN APPROACH IS “THE MENACE OF”, “A TRESPASS UPON”, THE SOVEREIGNTY OF YOUR PERSON.

AND YOU SHOULD HAVE NO HESITATION IN SAYING SO … NO MATTER WHO IS APPROACHING YOU, AND WHETHER OR NOT HE/SHE IS WEARING BLUE CLOTH, WITH MASONIC REGALIA ATTACHED.

Use a commanding voice:
“HOLD IT RIGHT THERE, BRO’! Take one more step and the sky could easily fall in on you, because I’ll have you for Common Assault! In front of witnesses. So, before taking that one more step, find out whether or not I can do that! I assure you I can, and will. Because I know the Law-of-the-Land … even if you apparently don’t!

You need some jurisdiction over me before I’m not able to report you for trespass. So, let’s discuss your jurisdiction, shall we? Before you end up behind bars? That would be the best idea, don’t you think? I know you feel pretty safe behind that uniform. But that’s only because very few people understand the Law and their Rights. And I’m not in that category. I know my Rights, and I know yours – even if you don’t.

Now, have I caused injury or loss to anyone? No? Have I breached the peace? No? Have I been devious in my promises and agreements? No? In that case you are way outside your jurisdiction, and came very close to CRIMINAL TRESPASS.
So back off … now … and stay there.

Your so-called authority is a House of Cards, built on sand. And it is obviously long past time you realised that. Right. Now. Before we go any further, show me documented proof of your authority and jurisdiction, and let’s discuss its limitations. Because there are very many of them.

Did you take an Oath of Service, in order to wear that uniform in public? Was it solemn? We can start from there. Repeat it for me, please …”

You will be standing in front of a QUITE PERPLEXED (and possibly slightly bemused) Policyman. (Quite possibly back-pedalling like mad).
It just takes ‘bottle’. Which comes from the knowledge that you have RIGHT ON YOUR SIDE (and a mouth with which to express your Rights … changing tones of voice appropriately)

(This information is based on the practical experiences of various people. Show any kind of ‘fear’, and you are done for. Your goose is thoroughly cooked. Stand up for yourself, know your Rights – which are in your heart – and it is possible, and people have shown, that a situation can be turned around to your favour. According to the Magna Carta 1215, it is every English person’s DUTY to do this, and thereby keep the corruption in check)

FMOTL.COM

John Harris Its an Illusion 2